DOOGEE V Max 2 Pro
What you’d gain
- 2.1× faster
- Battery: 4,350 → 22,000 mAh
What you’d give up
- Heavier: 240 → 635 g
How the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro compares with phones you can buy today: how long it still gets updates, what a new phone would add and what you’d give up. Every number comes from official specs and update policies.
The phone list could not load. Refresh the page to try again.
Your phone
Our take
Worth considering
Security updates end around 2032 Newer phones are about 2.1× faster The best upgrade scores 4.5 points higher on battery and 1.4 on performance
Based on specs and official update policies. It’s your call.
We don’t have a US launch price for the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro, so we compare it with upper mid-range phones and flagships, going by US launch price or, without one, by the chipset. Choose “Any price” above to see every phone. Rugged phones are compared with rugged phones by our Rugged score (performance, battery, display and water protection).
What you’d gain
What you’d give up
What you’d gain
What you’d give up
What you’d gain
What you’d give up
We may earn a commission if you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you. How we make money
Scores, speed and updates come from official specs, chip benchmarks (Geekbench 6, 3DMark) and the makers’ update policies. How we rate phones
Samsung promises 7 years of security updates for the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro, counted from its announcement in April 2025, so they should continue until around 2032. It gets 7 years of OS upgrades, until around 2032.
Based on specs, the best upgrade we found is the DOOGEE V Max 2 Pro, with a Rugged score of 7.5 vs 5.4 for the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro. We don’t have a US launch price for the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro, so we looked at upper mid-range phones and flagships, going by US launch price or, without one, by the chipset.
Going by the benchmarks of their chips, the DOOGEE V Max 2 Pro is about 2.1 times as fast as the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro. In Geekbench 6 multi-core it scores 4,600 vs 3,310, and in the 3DMark Steel Nomad Light graphics test 1,179 vs 379.
Check another phone · Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro specs and reviews