Google Tensor G4 vs Kirin 9020
The Google Tensor G4 and the Kirin 9020 are both flagship chips, made by Google and HiSilicon. In Geekbench 6, the two chips are nearly level in multi-core (4,520 vs 4,510), but the Google Tensor G4 is 45% faster in single-core. In 3DMark Steel Nomad Light, a graphics test, the Google Tensor G4 scores 131% higher (1,049 vs 455).
Benchmarks head to head
Full chipset rankingMulti-core Geekbench 6
Nearly levelSingle-core Geekbench 6
Google Tensor G4 +45%Graphics 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Google Tensor G4 +131%Higher is better. Bars are relative to the faster chip in each test. A dash means we don’t have a reliable result for that chip yet.
Key facts
Specs from the chip makers. The better result in each benchmark is highlighted.
| Google Tensor G4 | Kirin 9020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | HiSilicon | |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | Aug 2024 | Nov 2024 |
| Process | 4 nm Samsung | 7 nm SMIC N+2 |
| CPU | 8 cores 1× 3.1 GHz + 3× 2.6 GHz + 4× 1.92 GHz | 8 cores 1× 2.5 GHz + 3× 2.15 GHz + 4× 1.6 GHz |
| Max CPU speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 | Maleoon 920 |
| 5G modem | 5G via a separate modem | — |
| Place in our ranking | #37 of 102 (better) | #38 of 102 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 1,870 (better) | 1,290 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 4,520 | 4,510 |
| Graphics (3DMark Steel Nomad Light) | 1,049 (better) | 455 |
| Phones in our database | 6 phones | 4 phones |
| Best-rated phone | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 8.1 | Huawei Mate 80 7.8 |
| Lowest US launch price | $499 Google Pixel 10a | — |
| Newest phone | Google Pixel 10a Feb 2026 | Huawei Mate 80 Nov 2025 |
Phones with the Google Tensor G4
6 phones in our database, best rated first.
-
8.1 Discontinued
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
6.8″ 120 Hz, 50 MP camera, 5,060 mAh
From $1,099 + Compare -
8.0 Discontinued
Google Pixel 9 Pro
6.3″ 120 Hz, 50 MP camera, 4,700 mAh
From $999 + Compare -
7.4 Discontinued
Google Pixel 9
6.3″ 120 Hz, 50 MP camera, 4,700 mAh
From $799 + Compare -
7.1
Google Pixel 10a
6.3″ 120 Hz, 48 MP camera, 5,100 mAh
From $499 + Compare
Phones with the Kirin 9020
4 phones in our database, best rated first.
-
7.8
Huawei Mate 80
6.75″ 120 Hz, 50 MP camera, 5,750 mAh
No US price + Compare -
7.8
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
6.8″ 120 Hz, 50 MP camera, 5,170 mAh
No US price + Compare -
7.7
Huawei Pura 80 Pro
6.8″ 120 Hz, 50 MP camera, 5,170 mAh
No US price + Compare -
7.4
Huawei Mate X6
7.93″ 120 Hz, 50 MP camera, 5,110 mAh
No US price + Compare
Google Tensor G4 vs Kirin 9020: FAQ
Which is faster, the Google Tensor G4 or the Kirin 9020?
In Geekbench 6, the two chips are nearly level in multi-core (4,520 vs 4,510), but the Google Tensor G4 is 45% faster in single-core. In 3DMark Steel Nomad Light, a graphics test, the Google Tensor G4 scores 131% higher (1,049 vs 455). Real-world speed also depends on how well each phone keeps the chip cool and on its software.
Is the Google Tensor G4 or the Kirin 9020 better for gaming?
3DMark Steel Nomad Light measures graphics performance, which matters most for games. The Google Tensor G4 scores 131% higher than the Kirin 9020 (1,049 vs 455). Cooling, screen refresh rate and game support also make a difference, so check the phones themselves.
Which is newer, the Google Tensor G4 or the Kirin 9020?
The Kirin 9020 is newer: it was announced in November 2024, while the Google Tensor G4 was announced in August 2024.
Which phones use the Google Tensor G4 and the Kirin 9020?
The Google Tensor G4 powers 6 phones in our database, including the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, Google Pixel 9 Pro and Google Pixel 9. The lowest US launch price with this chip is $499, for the Google Pixel 10a. The Kirin 9020 powers 4 phones in our database, including the Huawei Mate 80, Huawei Pura 80 Ultra and Huawei Pura 80 Pro.
Where do these benchmark scores come from?
They are reference results for each chip: the median of several Geekbench 6 runs on retail phones. The 3DMark Steel Nomad Light graphics score is the median of the results for retail phones with the chip in the official ranking of UL, the maker of 3DMark. The same chip can score a little differently from phone to phone, depending on cooling, clock speeds and software.
More chipset comparisons
Pick any two chips, or open a popular comparison.